Beyond Automation: Sensemaking, Ontological Insecurity, and the Emergence of the AI-Form Organisation in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Kwan Hong Tan Singapore University of Social Sciences image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67177/gywqbn07

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Sensemaking, Professional Identity, Organisational Structure, Digital Transformation

Abstract

The integration of generative and agentic artificial intelligence (AI) represents a profound technological disruption to contemporary organisational life. While previous literature has largely focused on productivity gains and task automation, this qualitative and theoretical paper examines the sociotechnical and psychological implications of AI integration on knowledge workers and organisational structures. Drawing on Weick's sensemaking theory and phenomenological perspectives on professional identity, this study explores how autonomous AI agents precipitate ontological insecurity among white-collar professionals and catalyse the emergence of the "AI-Form" organisation, wherein algorithmic coordination displaces middle management. Through a critical synthesis of empirical literature and qualitative case studies (2024--2026), the findings suggest that successful digital transformation requires organisations to manage identity threats, foster psychological safety, and implement human-in-the-loop governance. Practical recommendations are offered for resolving the automation-augmentation paradox and driving sustainable business model innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baumann, O., & Wu, B. (2023). Managerial hierarchy in AI-driven organizations. Journal of Organization Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00147-9

Cardon, P. W., Getchell, K., Carradini, S., Fleischmann, C., & Stapp, J. (2023). Generative AI in the workplace: Employee perspectives of ChatGPT benefits and organizational policies. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/b3ezy

Cerchione, R. (2026). Artificial knowledge generation: Investigating the adoption of generative AI. Journal of Business Research (in press).

Chatlani, N. (2026). Generative AI and the future of knowledge work. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3772363.3799068

Dipoatmodjo, T. S. P. (2025). Experiencing change: A phenomenological study of employee adaptation to AI-driven digital transformation in a tech company. International Journal of Humanity and Applied Social Science.

European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689

Firnando, H. G. (2025). Analyzing Foucault's theory in digital security policy in the age of AI. International Journal of Social and Political Sciences.

Goto, M. (2022). Professionals' sensemaking about artificial intelligence. Journal of Professions and Organization, 9(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joac002

Gunathilake, P. D. C. (2025). Generative AI and knowledge work: Towards a framework for combating deskilling of knowledge workers. DiVA Portal.

Hagh Pors, M. (2025). Algorithmic governmentality and the European digital subject: A discourse analysis of the European strategy for data. LUT University.

Hogemann, M., Hein, L., Britsche, J.-O., & Thomas, O. (2025). Technostress and generative AI in the workplace: A qualitative analysis of young professionals. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1728881. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1728881

Issa, H., Kadian, A., Ahuja, S., & Nishant, R. (2024). When a dream turns into a nightmare: A case study of an education technology startup to uncover the dark side of generative AI. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 54, 1048–1078. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05444

Kumar, A., Krishnamoorthy, B., & Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2024). Machine learning and artificial intelligence-induced technostress in organizations: A study on automation–augmentation paradox with socio-technical systems as coping mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32, 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2023-3581

Mohamad, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence for business model innovation in digital sustainability companies: Multiple cases from the Netherlands. ResearchGate.

Nisa, U. (2025). Agentic AI: The age of reasoning—A review. Array, 26, 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100516

Savitri, C. A. (2026). Goodbye hierarchy, hello algorithm: The rise of AI-form organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2025-5621

Sharma, V., Deb, S., Mahajan, Y., & Ghosal, A. (2025). Psychological impacts of AI-induced job displacement among Indian IT professionals: A Delphi-validated thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2556445

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.

Woodruff, A. (2024). How knowledge workers think generative AI will (not) transform their jobs. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642700

Yaroglu, A. C. (2025). Shaping organizational communication: The impact of AI and language through Weick's sensemaking theory. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251327584

Zene, M., Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2026). The generative AI challenge: Investigating impacts on perceived employability and the rise of maladaptive use in knowledge workers. University of Verona.

Zulu, N. C. (2026). What does generative AI mean for my professional competence? Insights into the perspectives of digital creative professionals. Interacting with Computers. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwaf003

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.